Time Magazine Getting desperate
When I saw this Time cover my first thought
was…“What”???? My second thought was “Huh”???? My third thought was “Wow that
is completely unnecessary”. If Time Magazine is looking to create buzz then
this is successful. If they are looking for shock value then they are on the
right track. If they are looking to maintain their reputation as a relevant and
respected news magazine they might was to rethink this.
If people want shock value they read the National
Enquirer. If they want to see naked woman they buy porn magazines. I am pretty
sure most people don’t want to see a hot mom with a 3 year old sucking her boob.
If they do they have problems.
First this is not news. This is not a hot button topic
worthy of national discussion. Worthy of the cover of Time Magazine. There are
no laws about to be passed on the subject. There are no protests going on
concerning this issue. It is a non story. The only point of the story is so
Time can put a hot mom on their cover with a three year old sucking her boob.
Everyone on Facebook is talking about the picture but
not the topic. That is because nobody cares about the topic. This topic
without that picture would never make the cover. It is nothing more then a
stunt.
There is a presidential election in 6 months. There are
wars in Afganistan, and Pakistan. There is civil war in Syria. There was a
terrorist attempt a couple of days back. There is a standoff in the South China
Sea. Gas is $4.00. Unemployment is high. There are a billion important issues
and the best Time can come up with is a 3 year old breastfeeding. Maybe I am
getting old but I don’t get it. Not from them. If Time Magazine wants to put
naked woman on their cover that is fine with me. But leave the 3 year old out
of it. It is disturbing.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home